In June, the European Parliament (EP) submitted a proposal “Artificial Intelligence Act”, whose aim is to limit risks in its application and at the same time utilize its innovative potential. During the discussions, the parliament suggested that the code of governance should be limited to the main providers of UI, mainly from the USA.
archive video
The 34th annual film awards gala of the Games is on the topic of artificial intelligence (Source: TASR/Martina Kriková)
The governments of three member states, according to a joint document accessed by Reuters on Saturday (18 November), concluded that this apparent competitive advantage could actually damage trust in European providers and reduce the number of customers.
Pravidlá správania a transparency by preto podla nich mali bóch závázné pre oveční aktérov. Initially, according to the document, no sanctions should be imposed. If, however, after a certain period of time a violation of the administrative code was detected, the sanctioning system could be introduced. In the future by dodržinjanie noriem monitored by the body at the level of the EU.
The German Ministry of Economy is of the opinion that laws and state control should not regulate artificial intelligence alone, but its use. The Minister for Digital Affairs Volker Wissing stated to Reuters that the EU wants to play the role of the UI “the world’s top league”must regulate applications, but not technology.
Tags: states agreed approaches regulation artificial intelligence
-
